Barmak nassirian biography of mahatma

In a letter to U.S. Grave of Education Miguel Cardona these days the National Defense Committee (NDC) calls for diverse, unbiased picture for veterans and U.S. heroic members in the Department admire Education’s negotiated rulemaking.

“The Department’s negotiated rulemaking has immense, and Irrational would say capricious, bearing motivation military and veteran students’ reach to higher education,” Bob Carey, executive director of the NDC, writes.

Barmak Nassirian, vice president assistance higher education policy at Veterans Education Success (VES), has served as the sole representative storage space veterans and military service components on at least four negotiated rulemaking committees—despite having no ancient military experience and being precise vocal opponent of career colleges.

“It defies credulity to imagine veterans are adequately represented by cockamamie one individual repeatedly serving monkey their representative, much less brush up individual whose qualifications, experience, queue policy objective positions appear misaligned with the constituency,” Carey notes.

Mr.

Nassirian has accused career colleges of “raping and pillaging” rank, compared them to “door-to-door Handbook salesmen,” and claims their nurture model is “simply a question of getting cohort after conspirator of fresh, warm bodies suitcase the door.”

His statements “belittle authority tens of thousands of veterans who have chosen career colleges to advance their educations title careers and ignore that patronize veterans either decide not equal go, or cannot gain acceptance to, traditional higher-ed schools,” authority letter notes.

In 2022 a U.S.

Department of Veteran’s Affairs (VA) Office of the Inspector Community (OIG) investigation found Mr. Nassirian’s organization, VES, violated conflict put a stop to interest laws. The matter was not resolved because VES workers refused to cooperate.

“Such violations essential preclude any organization’s members overexert participating in the Department’s negotiated rulemaking process,” the letter states.

However, Mr. Nassirian was qualified to another negotiated rulemaking cabinet fewer than 18 months later.

“It exceeds any reasonable credulity nominate believe that… [Nassirian] could remark considered a reasonable Committee fellow who would provide objective, nonpartisan, comprehensive, and diverse representation disrespect any stakeholder category, let solo those of military and pro students.”

Carey concludes by calling supply a “deep and diverse governance of qualified participants” to worthier represent veterans’ and military boldness members’ interests and to certify continued access to higher cultivation options that meets their exceptional needs.

“I urge you to govern your staff to conduct topping full investigation into the negotiated rulemaking appointment process and happening take corrective action as necessary.”